North Carolina Bill Would Require People to Share Their IDs With Social Media Companies

In North Carolina, legislators consider a legislative template that would do it Give consumers more control Collected and sold by data by companies. Great! Who can argue about it? But that’s not all what it is about. According to the national trends, it would also set disturbing age review requirements for social media. Although these laws are recorded in a framework of “Save the Kids”, they probably cause more damage than benefits.

Last month, the Senators Terry Brown (D) and all chessers (r) the senators present them NC Personal Data Privacy Act, Law, This contains six consumer rights in relation to personal data. Among them can people apply for to see what information about them is collected, inaccuracies are correct and decide whether companies sell their data to third parties. Some information is excluded, as in health information protected under Hipaa. In addition, companies do not have to comply with if this would reveal the business secrets.

The calculation seems to follow this partly Consumer Privacy Act by North Carolinawhich was previously introduced in the Senate but died in the committee. Eric Null, co-director of the data protection and data project of democracy and technology, Gizmodo announced by email that the draft law is “another example of industry-friendly data protection laws”, which essentially restart the current law on deceptive practices due to “weak data minimization protection”.

In contrast to his predecessor, this calculation not only focuses on the privacy of consumers. In the second half, social media also have to define “appropriate age review methods” in order to prevent minors from creating accounts without parental permission. According to the law, social media platforms must use third-party providers to carry out this process. The approved methods include the provision of a driver’s license from third parties or another form of the government issued by the government. There are some exceptions to this process, such as gaming websites or platforms that generate annual sales of less than 100,000 US dollars.

The legislation on age verification is often associated with the restriction of porn access as with Texas’ HB 1181, which is now the center of A Case of the Supreme Court. Last year North Carolina even adopted her own porn bill called Pave Act. However, the legislation on the expansion of the age review to social media was reported nationwide. In 2023, Arkansas passed his versionand numerous states consider invoices, including MinnesotaWhich actually wants to implement an anonymous review, and Pennsylvania. US senators have also reintroduced this year Children from Social Media Act Information of the age review of social media.

However, everyone with an ounce of consciousness would look back on this legislation. First of all: you won’t work. It is already easy to bypass the age review to porn website. According to zero, however, the age review is “privacy invasive”, especially if it requires the use of a third -party provider.

“The requirement … does not benefit anyone except for age review providers,” said zero. “Forcing something like this, even more data protection is intrusive, since the social media company does not only have access [to] User -ids also service provider. “

Although most of the invoices of social media platforms and/or providers prevent people from keeping the information from humans, they cannot guarantee this. Companies are constantly lying about what data they have or how they are used. (This makes it a little ironic, mandates for checking the slider into an invoice that is classified as data protection, but I wander down.) In addition, data injuries will. more and more often, This can have real consequences such as identity theft.

Data protection representatives such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation have also found that the legislation for age verification is becoming disproportionately restrict Already marginalized communities. In the United States, millions of adults either have no state ID or they cannot receive. This Most affected Visit people with low -income people, the elderly, young adults and color communities. Overall, laws seem to be a problem, but the age review only falls below the usual moral panic of the United States, which is disguised as progress.