“Expect to be served, you are pig”! ” Jake Paul unleashes lawyers after Chavez Jr.

Jake Paul transforms his post-Chavez Jr. victory into a full legal show. After improving his record at 12-1 with a boring and clear victory over Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. in Anaheim, Paul no longer has patience for anyone calling for a joke. Now, he and his manager are unleashed with defamation threats – and it seems more desperate than dominant.

Paul – Chavez: Is Piers Morgan in difficulty?

The television host Piers Morgan unleashed two beards on X:

“I had a better fight with Jake Paul on Thursday than the inaccessible farce that took place this evening.”
“The guy has lined his pockets with $$$$ buckets – but he kills boxing with these boring bulls in progress *** against older fighters beyond their peak.”

A few days earlier, Paul had sat on non -censored Piers Morgan – only to mark an anchor an “fat A **” before ending the interview spectacular.

Jake Paul’s legal threats after Chavez Jr.

“After years to let him slide like” hate enemies “, I asked my team to vigorously pursue anyone who invents lies about my boxing career. Expect to use pigs, ”groaned Paul on social networks.

Director Nakisa Bidarian has accumulated with even harder language:

“This statement is baseless and irresponsible. Last night’s fight against Chavez Jr. was a fully sanctioned 10 -round cruise fight, officiated by California State Athletic Commission with official judges. No staging / rigging – just a hard work and a legitimate victory. To say the contrary not only undermined the integrity of sport, but is defamatory and causes reputation damage to MVP, Jake Paul and the Commission. Enough it is enough. We will explore all the options, including legal action, to hold those who disseminate such deliberate and harmful lies.

Now, even podcasters and bloggers sweat. Did Paul’s team follow each tweet, a post and article that dares to question his legitimacy? They warned against the assignments, deposits and allegations of damage which could bury small points of sale in legal costs.

Defamation exercise: what Paul must prove

Under Californian law, to prevail in a defamation pursuit, an applicant must show that the declaration in question:

1. Transmitted an assertive fact (not a pure opinion)

2. What a false

3. Was published on others

4. Caused reputation damage

Because Jake Paul is a public personality, he also faces the “real malice” standard – he must prove that criticisms knew that their statements were false or acted with reckless contempt for the truth which is a heaviness, requiring clear and convincing evidence that the defendants have entertained serious doubts about their comment.

It is difficult to see it as something other than a panic for. Instead of letting the punches speak, Paul arms his lawyers. Will this legal Blitz be silent or simply amplify the show? One thing is certain: Jake Paul’s next fight may not be in the ring, but in a courtroom. “Haters”, consider yourself that you have warned.